Legalism is one of those
things we dislike in other people but generally like if we get to set the
parameters. And what’s really wrong with
it? we wonder. (When it’s our legalism, anyway. We know what’s wrong with everyone else’s
legalism.) It just means that some
things are right and others are wrong, right?
That’s fine in math.
As much as many of us say we
hate math, we like the aspect of it that 2+2=4 and 2+5≠8. And it’s always that way. (Yes, I know that it’s usually at this point
that some egghead objects that, “Well, not always. When talking of theoretical numbers … “ Um, dude, I wasn’t talking about theoretical
numbers, nor was I talking about 2+2 in the context of a larger
calculation. Left alone, 2+2=4, OK?)
Anyway, we want life to be
like that. In this context, we would
like morality to be like that. I know of
a church, a good, strong, Bible-teaching church in most ways, that asks
everyone who becomes a member to sign a “no-alcohol” pledge. I wonder if that includes Nyquil?
And there’s the rub. See, it’s not just that Nyquil helps some
people (not me, it keeps me awake!), it’s that the Apostle Paul encouraged
Timothy to take a little wine for his stomach.
Why? Maybe as a sedative, maybe
as just a sort of bi-carb. I know people
who find that a small glass of wine helps them to relax their muscles and sleep
better at night—possibly because of the antioxidants.
But see, we also know the
danger of alcoholism. Pick up a
newspaper (remember those? If not, ask your
grandparents, they still have one delivered right
to the front door!) and read through it.
There was probably a wreck near your house last night and alcohol was
the presumed cause. Someone had too much
and thought they could drive just fine.
So it seems easier to say,
“Let’s just ban all alcohol.” And
honestly, if I never had another alcoholic beverage between now and death, I
probably won’t be missing out on much of anything. (The same could be said of soft drinks,
cheese, and TV, but let’s stick to alcohol for at least one more paragraph.)
If Jim Smith decides that he
is going to swear off alcohol, I have no problem with that. Maybe he’s doing it for medical reasons, or
because he wants to be an example to his kids or maybe it was some good friend
of his who caused that alcohol-laced crash we read about two paragraphs
back. Maybe Jim just feels like the
alcohol was coming between him and God in some way. When Jim tells me, then, that he’s giving up
alcohol and why, I’ll probably say something like, “Good for you!”
The problem is when human
nature kicks in, as it so often does, and Jim starts telling me and everyone
else around that we have to give up alcohol.
His reason(s) for giving it up might be spectacular. However, there’s not a Bible verse that says,
“Thou shalt not drink alcohol!” and to pretend that there is, or that this
man-made wisdom one has discovered should be canonized, is when we abandon
wisdom for legalism.
Of course, alcohol is not
the only place where legalism creeps in, often under the guise of serving
God. I know of another church which will
not allow a person to become a member who has ever gone through a divorce.
I don’t like divorce, either, and could spend another whole blog arguing
whether the Bible permits it in some circumstances or not, but what I want to
address here is one particular bugaboo.
Joe Public married Janie
Abernathy one day. Three years later,
Joe and Janie divorced. For this blog, we’ll
say the reason they divorced was because Janie tended to burn the toast and Joe
often left his clothes on the floor. In
other words, their sacred vows were discarded in favor of convenience. Two years after the divorce, Joe married Susy
Applecart. The new Mister and Mrs.
Public started attending First Church—maybe because it was where they got
married—and then they decided to give their lives to Christ. Both come forward and are immersed one
Sunday, praise the Lord!
This church I know of (which
I introduced two paragraphs back, for those who don’t remember), would not let
Joe become a member because of his past divorce. I understand their championship of marriage,
but do you realize what they are doing?
They are holding against Joe a sin God does not hold against him! Was it a good thing that Joe divorced
Janie? No. There may continue to be repercussions,
especially if he and Janie had kids, but having repented, his sins are now
taken as far away as the east is from the west.
How dare a church say, “But we
don’t forgive you!”
Through all this, I still
say I understand the appeal of legalism.
It would be easier to just say, “No alcohol, no gambling, no divorce, no
whatever!” But, amazingly, God gave us
brains and trusts us to use them! Sure,
alcohol can be a problem but used properly it can be a help. Gambling can become a problem and—it could be
argued—is a waste of money about 99.9% of the time, but maybe God didn’t
prohibit it because he knew that serving him is going to require us to take
some risks.
Maybe it’s why he tells us,
through Paul, to “take every thought captive.”
Every day, every moment, every thought, has great potential. Maybe some of these things aren’t sinful in
and of themselves, but—at this moment in time—they could cloud or derail that
potential.