Some of the people who are on the same political side as the rioters say things, in reference to the rioters, like, "At least they have passion."
See, because no matter what the last president did or didn't do that his opponents disliked--even vehemently--there were no parades of people destroying property, shouting vulgarities, or dressing like the losers of a junior high bet. And not all leftists agree with the tactics of these left-whining vandals, but neither are they knocking each other over to condemn the miscreants.
"They have passion, it's just ... um, misguided."
Sure, go with that.
It's as if passion somehow trumps (ha!) lawfulness, kindness, and good sense. And the left-leaning national news (but I repeat myself) treats them not as vandals but as modern day Boston Tea Partiers.
Even with the news on their side (vacuously and untruthfully though it is), I have to wonder about the motivation(s) of whoever is starting these things. The participants are just morons who want to destroy and have found protection in crowds, but somewhere behind all this there is someone with an end game, a goal.
Under normal circumstances, I would think that the driving force has an idea he/she or they are trying to convert others to. Maybe they do, but who is going to watch knuckleheads on TV turning over cars and setting fire to things and then think, "You know, those idiots make a pretty good point. I wish I could change my vote"?
In fact, the actions of the rioters seem to me to be not only destructive towards property, but towards their own agenda for the likely outcome would be to galvanize the opposition.
P.S. And have you ever noticed that even the non-riot leftist get-togethers--like the post-inaugural Women's March--always leave the grounds where they were held dirtier and more trash-filled than before the conclave, but get-togethers like the recent March for Life actually leave the area cleaner than they found it? And then the people who trashed the park try to claim they're the ones who love the environment.
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Thursday, February 2, 2017
Snowflake Riot
Labels:
leftists,
March for Life,
MSM,
news,
protest,
protesters,
riots,
Trump,
Women's March
Monday, August 25, 2014
In the News
Ministers—professional
preachers, anyway—have been in the news recently, both nationally and
locally. And it hasn’t been good.
That, in itself, is a shame,
on many levels.
A few years ago I was
sitting with a man whose father was on hospice.
I had arrived at the hospital as a hospice volunteer to sit with a man
who was dying so that the family could leave the hospital—go home, maybe get a
nap or a shower or just get out of the hospital for a while. One of the man’s sons, though, kept thanking
me for being there but not leaving. He
needed someone to unload on, and I was there.
(This happens a lot in hospice: people just needing to talk. Most of them are pleasant, many are sad, I’ve
only had to deal with one who was really angry.)
As the son sat there,
talking about the passing of his father, I learned a couple things. One, the man didn’t really like his
father. He loved his father in a vague
way, but he didn’t like his father because—according to the monologue—his
father had been hard and harsh and grumpy.
Still, he had provided for his family and taken good care of his wife
(their mother), so there was at least some respect for that.
The second thing I learned
from this son was that all church ministers/preachers were money-cheating crooks. Every single one of them. All they were in it for was the money. Yes, he knew I was a minister but, while he
never accused me to my face, it was clear he was painting me with the same
broad brush. As I thought of my one-car,
one-bath existence, I listened respectfully and tried not to argue or
laugh. I did wonder where he had gotten
this idea because, as the conversation (monologue) wore on, it seemed like he
had only once in his life had any sort of lasting relationship with a minister
or church. I knew the building (not far
from where I sit right now) and the man who had been the minister there when
this son was young had been someone the son admired. Loving, good teacher, impoverished. Somehow, somewhere along the line the son had
gotten the idea that all preachers were just in it for the money and would not
be disabused of that idea.
I thought maybe he had a
story—and, sadly, there are plenty of them out there—of a minister who
absconded with some funds or cheated a widow out of her legacy. If he had such a story, he never told it, to
me, anyway. Maybe he had just seen the
stories on the news of mammon-obsessed preachers, but I don’t think so. It seemed too personal. Still, I imagine that the stories on the news
only fed his preconceived notions. The
son wasn’t a moron. He knew about local
ministers who fed the poor, sat up to all hours at the hospital, visited the
elderly, but he ascribed to us—one and all—bad motives.
(This, I am convinced, is
how most prejudices work. They may begin
with a legitimate gripe against one person, but the Enemy creeps in
and—through news stories and the anecdotes of “friends”—convinces us that our
one-time experience is the norm. Jim-Bob
Smith has had one bad experience with a member of a certain ethnic group—against
many many good experiences, for
instance—but he has allowed himself to be convinced that the bad experience
speaks for everyone of that ethnic group and the myriad good experiences were
all aberrations.)
So anyway, nationally we
have a popular and well-known minister being asked to step down from the pulpit
for a time because—at the very least—he seems to have let his fame go to his
head and—at the worst—he has become a spiritual and emotional bully. Locally, we’ve had a couple ministers asked
to resign their positions for, shall we say, “indiscretions”? Like everyone else, I’m wondering (in regards to both the local and the national stories), “What
happened? Surely these guys had to know
they were going to get caught! Why throw
everything they had worked for away?” I
have been praying for their families and the churches they formerly served.
But what is especially
bugging me is that, as a minister of
the gospel myself, I know these “ministers” have just helped fuel the thoughts
of people like the son previously mentioned who will look at all of
us—Christians in general and ministers in particular—and think, “Yep, that’s
what they’re all like.”
[P.S. I mean that my house only has one bathtub,
not that I only take one bath a year.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
